Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or GPT-6 Astra?
Claude Opus 5.5, at $4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens. GPT-6 Astra is $10 input and $50 output at OpenAI's short-context rates, so Astra costs 2.5x as much on both sides.
Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4/$20 and GPT-6 Astra costs $10/$50 per 1M input/output tokens on the API.
Pick Claude Opus 5.5 if you want the flagship model at the lower price, or if you work in Claude Code, where it is already the default: it costs $4 / $20 per 1M tokens against GPT-6 Astra's $10 / $50. Pick GPT-6 Astra if you live in ChatGPT and Codex and want what OpenAI calls its most capable model. Both have roughly 1M-token context windows.
| Spec | Claude Opus 5.5 | GPT-6 Astra |
|---|---|---|
| Released | Sep 22, 2026 | - |
| Status | Available | Available |
| API model ID | claude-opus-5-5 | gpt-6-astra |
| API price (in / out) | $4 / $20 per 1M tokens | $10 / $50 per 1M tokens |
| Cache read | $0.20 per 1M tokens | $1 per 1M tokens |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1.05M tokens |
| Plans | Pro, Max, Team, Enterprise | - |
| Platforms | Claude API, Amazon Bedrock, Claude Platform on AWS, Google Cloud, Microsoft Foundry | OpenAI API |
| Runs in | Claude, Claude Code | ChatGPT, Codex |
"-" means we could not verify the value on a vendor page, not that it doesn't exist.
Claude Opus 5.5, at $4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens. GPT-6 Astra is $10 input and $50 output at OpenAI's short-context rates, so Astra costs 2.5x as much on both sides.
They are close: GPT-6 Astra lists 1.05M tokens and Claude Opus 5.5 lists 1M. Both allow up to 128k output tokens.
Claude Code defaults to Opus 5.5 on Pro, Max, Team, Enterprise and the API. Codex defaults to GPT-6 Sol, not Astra; you select Astra yourself.
Not from a neutral source we can cite. Anthropic publishes Opus 5.5 scores on its launch page (for example 66.4% on Terminal-Bench 4.0), but we could not load OpenAI's Astra launch page to compare like for like, so we leave that out.