Model vs model

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra

Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4/$20 and GPT-6 Astra costs $10/$50 per 1M input/output tokens on the API.

· today

Quick answer

Pick Claude Opus 5.5 if you want the flagship model at the lower price, or if you work in Claude Code, where it is already the default: it costs $4 / $20 per 1M tokens against GPT-6 Astra's $10 / $50. Pick GPT-6 Astra if you live in ChatGPT and Codex and want what OpenAI calls its most capable model. Both have roughly 1M-token context windows.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra specs

SpecClaude Opus 5.5GPT-6 Astra
ReleasedSep 22, 2026-
StatusAvailableAvailable
API model IDclaude-opus-5-5gpt-6-astra
API price (in / out)$4 / $20 per 1M tokens$10 / $50 per 1M tokens
Cache read$0.20 per 1M tokens$1 per 1M tokens
Context window1M tokens1.05M tokens
PlansPro, Max, Team, Enterprise-
PlatformsClaude API, Amazon Bedrock, Claude Platform on AWS, Google Cloud, Microsoft FoundryOpenAI API
Runs inClaude, Claude CodeChatGPT, Codex

"-" means we could not verify the value on a vendor page, not that it doesn't exist.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or GPT-6 Astra?

Claude Opus 5.5, at $4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens. GPT-6 Astra is $10 input and $50 output at OpenAI's short-context rates, so Astra costs 2.5x as much on both sides.

Which has the bigger context window?

They are close: GPT-6 Astra lists 1.05M tokens and Claude Opus 5.5 lists 1M. Both allow up to 128k output tokens.

Which one do the coding agents use by default?

Claude Code defaults to Opus 5.5 on Pro, Max, Team, Enterprise and the API. Codex defaults to GPT-6 Sol, not Astra; you select Astra yourself.

Are there head-to-head benchmarks?

Not from a neutral source we can cite. Anthropic publishes Opus 5.5 scores on its launch page (for example 66.4% on Terminal-Bench 4.0), but we could not load OpenAI's Astra launch page to compare like for like, so we leave that out.

Also compared

Sources