LLMs · in Live trend research
Claude for Live trend research
Synthesis into a brief in the Live trend research stack. Long-context turn that takes both feeds and outputs a 5-bullet brief. Same prompt every week makes the briefs comparable.
· 1 weeks ago
Where Claude fits in the workflow
- 3Synthesize with Claude
Both outputs into Claude. One brief out the other side.
Prompt · 5-bullet weekly trend briefSynthesize the two inputs below into a brief I can read in 90 seconds. Live pulse (Grok output): """ {{paste Grok output}} """ Cited sources (Perplexity output): """ {{paste Perplexity output with links}} """ Output (in this order, ready to paste into a doc or Slack): 1. **TL;DR** — one sentence, the single thing I should know this week. 2. **What's actually happening** — 2 to 3 bullets, each with a date and a primary-source link. 3. **What people are arguing about** — 1 to 2 bullets, each with a representative quote. 4. **The under-radar story** — 1 bullet on something the big outlets missed. 5. **What changed since last week** — 1 to 2 bullets, comparison to the prior brief. Constraints: - Every bullet has a name, date, or number. - No "in the rapidly evolving landscape", no "experts say", no "could have implications for". - No em dashes. Output as Markdown.
Cost in this stack
Free tier
Of the $0/mo solo, weekly habit budget
Tool pricing
$20/mo Pro · Sonnet API $3/$15 per M tokens (input/output)
Alternatives to Claude at this step
Other tools in the Live trend research stack
Other stacks using Claude
Full-stack with Lovable
Role: Product + scope decisions
Cloud IDE with Replit
Role: Scope + tradeoff calls
UI-first with v0
Role: Product + DB design
AI newsletter
Role: Synthesis + voice
AI newsletter (Substack)
Role: Synthesis + voice
AI thumbnails + ad creative
Role: Prompt engineer
See the full Live trend research stack
Workflow, costs at three usage tiers, prompts, pitfalls.
Spotted something off?
Wrong price, dead link, stale tool — anything. We review every fix.